Payment processors need to constantly be on the edge of innovative technologies and tools, especially when high-risk businesses are concerned. With cyber-attacks and fraud being a constant danger for businesses in high-risk industries, a payment processor specializing in such a niche needs to be up to the task of protecting both businesses and their customers.

At the same time, the increasing backend complexity of payment processors shouldn’t be reflected in how easy to use they are or how smoothly they operate. The clients in high-risk industries are just as interested in fast processing and ease-of-use as clients in any other low-risk niche, so, a payment processor for high-risk businesses in 2025 needs to work as smoothly and effortlessly as any other.

What Should a Good Payment Processor Deliver for High-Risk Businesses in 2025?

When visiting paycompass.com or any other top-notch high-risk payment processor, businesses in 2025 expect to see the following seven features most of all.

1. Security is the Main Priority for High-Risk Businesses

A high-risk business is labeled as such because of the often overwhelming risk of fraud, cyber-attacks, and credit card data theft that such businesses face on a daily basis. A quality high-risk payment processor must be able to protect businesses and their customers as effectively as possible. Fraud detection algorithms and AI-powered tools need to work in conjunction with quality encryption and tokenization technologies, and fraud cases should be both kept to a minimum and dealt with as efficiently as possible when they do occur.

2. Reducing Transaction Rejections

Transaction rejections can happen for various reasons, be it incorrect credit card or expiration date, insufficient funds, or a technical error. Examining the response code can sometimes reveal the reason, but finding the exact answer usually requires an inquiry with the bank that rejected the transaction.

Some of the common reasons for transaction rejections are out of the control of a payment processor, but others aren’t. Minimizing errors is key for keeping transaction rejections to a minimum, but how the payment processor handles the rejections that do happen is equally important.

The process for handling a transaction rejection and guiding the customer to a subsequent successful transaction is key for both customer satisfaction and retention, and preventing revenue loss for the business due to transaction rejections.

3. Ensuring Smoother Payment Flows

The customers of businesses in high-risk industries require a smooth and fast payment flow as much as the businesses themselves. Protection from fraud and cyber-attacks shouldn’t come at the expense of processing speeds and it shouldn’t hamper the payment processor’s capabilities for handling large numbers of transactions at the same time.  

4. Continuous Compliance with Industry Standards and Regulations

Regulations change on a monthly basis and are usually especially stringent for businesses in high-risk industries. This can be particularly problematic for those operating in multiple states and countries, as different places have different industry standards and compliance regulations.

As such, a 2025 high-risk payment processor must comply with all current industry regulations. Furthermore, it should assist the high-risk businesses that use it in complying with their end of regulations compliance as well. From keeping up with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) to staying up to date with any minute change in a random state’s legislation, streamlining payment processing doesn’t mean forgoing regulation compliance.

5. Proactive Chargeback Management

Chargebacks can be even more frustrating for businesses to deal with than transaction rejections. What’s more, they are often fraudulent too, and not just in the case of insufficient funds or a technical error. A 2025 high-rich payment solution should have excellent chargeback detection capabilities and should be able to prevent a huge number of attempted chargebacks.

6. Ease-of-Use for Customers is a Must

Both the clients of high-risk businesses and the businesses themselves need the front end of payment processors to be as easy and intuitive to use as possible. The fact that a 2025 high-risk industry payment solution has a lot of moving parts on the backend of things doesn’t change the fact that people are using it for business purposes and those necessitate a fast, smooth, and easy experience. Customers don’t have the patience and often even the know-how to operate a convoluted and overly busy UI, so, a big part of streamlining payment processing for high-risk businesses in 2025 is making them as easy to use as possible.

7. Enable Proper Scalability

Cloud-based payment processors have proven to be very capable and sought-after by businesses in any high- or low-risk industry because they offer excellent scalability. This is crucial for the ability of businesses to not only grow and expand but to employ aggressive marketing strategies that rely on rapid bursts of high traffic periods. Promotions, holiday discounts, and other seasonal events are great for businesses but only if the payment processors they use can handle rapid traffic spikes.

 

The post Streamlining Payment Processing for High-Risk Businesses in 2025 appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

Data is one of the most valuable resources in the world. 

Despite its ubiquity in the digital age, companies are constantly clamoring for more, leveraging it to power everything from artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to customer personalization. 

As a result, the number of US data centers has soared, surpassing 5,388 – 70 percent more than the next ten largest markets combined. 

These expansive complexes are perpetually attacked by bad actors looking to steal the valuable data and expensive equipment stored inside. 

While much attention is given to the virtual perimeter and the potential for cyber attacks to exploit software vulnerabilities, threat actors are increasingly exploiting gaps in a data center’s physical security posture to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information and critical systems.

In other words, data security starts at the perimeter. 

The Limits of Existing Security Protocols 

To be sure, companies are not ignorant of the risk, nor are they leaving their data centers unprotected. 

Many are making the needed investments in physical and cybersecurity. 

However, data centers are typically in remote, rural areas and rely on a patchwork of legacy security systems that are outdated, poorly integrated, and vulnerable to exploitation. 

These traditional security technologies have not changed in years.

For instance, data centers often deploy access control systems that rely on access cards or PINs to authenticate each user at access points. For additional security, some organizations might deploy biometric access solutions, like fingerprint readers, iris readers, or other biometric recognition technology.

These tech-focused security solutions are frequently paired with physical security solutions, like on-site security personnel. These talented and important personnel are frequently in short supply, experience high turnover rates, and require extensive training and certification requirements.

In many ways, existing solutions are the worst of both worlds. They incur significant upkeep costs and introduce unnecessary friction while achieving only modest security improvements. 

Perhaps most problematically, they prevent organizations from leveraging new technologies and security solutions, making adapting to an always-changing security landscape more challenging. 

Inadequate data center security can have enormous implications, including introducing regulatory compliance concerns or failing to account for complicated security scenarios, like tailgating. 

Tailgating Typifies Complicated Security Vulnerabilities 

Tailgating, when an unauthorized person follows an authorized person through a secure point, exemplifies the limitations of many access control solutions.

Politeness, social conventions, or lack of awareness can lead the authorized person to hold the door or otherwise fail to challenge the unauthorized individual. 

The risk of tailgating is multifaceted, including: 

  • Regulatory Non-Compliance: Tailgating can lead to violations of security regulations, potentially resulting in fines, legal penalties, and reputational damage.
  • Cyberattacks: Tailgaters may introduce malware or ransomware, disrupting operations and causing significant downtime.
  • Theft: Tailgaters may target physical assets like equipment and supplies or steal sensitive data from computers and servers.
  • Targeted Violence: Tailgating can allow individuals to harm employees within the facility.
  • Espionage: Competitors may use tailgating to gain access to confidential information, leading to leaks and competitive disadvantage. 

Many employees don’t even identify tailgating as a potential security concern if the cost is inconsequential and the risk is negligible. In reality, tailgating can easily cause incredibly costly security incidents that set companies back hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars. 

Of course, tailgating is just one potential vulnerability, but it typifies the far-reaching and complicated physical and cybersecurity scenarios data centers experience. 

It highlights the critical need for a modern data center security solution that integrates physical and cybersecurity measures to effectively mitigate a wide range of threats.

What Modern Data Center Security Should Look Like 

Data centers need access control solutions that are flexible, scalable, easy to use and deploy, and seamlessly integrated. They are right to look to technology to protect their physical infrastructure. 

Data centers should look for security solutions that are:

  • built to protect privacy and support regulatory compliance
  • designed to simplify enrollment and administration while increasing security
  • equipped with advanced security features, like tailgate detection
  • flexible and scalable to accommodate your data center’s needs 
  • built with trusted technology

Biometric authentication offers a sophisticated approach to data center access control. By harnessing unique individual characteristics, it transcends the limitations of traditional methods like keycards or PINs, offering a more secure and user-friendly experience.

However, traditional facial recognition systems can raise privacy concerns. These systems often collect biometric data without explicit user consent, comparing captured images to extensive databases for authentication. This approach can potentially expose personally identifiable information (PII).

In contrast, facial authentication allows users to opt in or out without exposing personally identifiable information. 

Regardless of your data center security solution, ensure it prioritizes a balance of robust security, user convenience, and privacy protection to effectively safeguard your valuable assets and maintain compliance.

Secure Data Centers Keep Data Secure 

Data centers are the lifeblood of the digital economy, housing the critical infrastructure that powers our era of tech development. 

It’s a precious resource that deserves to be protected with a comprehensive security strategy that prioritizes physical and cyber defenses without compromise. 

Data centers must evolve beyond outdated models and embrace a future where security is seamlessly integrated, user-friendly, and privacy-minded. 

Only then can they effectively safeguard the information that fuels our digital world and ensure a future built on trust and innovation.

 

The post How Effective Data Center Security Starts at the Perimeter with Advanced Physical Security Solutions appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

Apono, a leading provider of privileged access solutions for the cloud, announced key achievements from 2024 alongside its strategic plans for growth and innovation in 2025. These milestones highlight the company’s dedication to advancing cloud access governance, minimizing excessive permissions, and mitigating risks from internal and external threats.

In 2024, Apono successfully completed its Series A funding round, raising $15.5 million to disrupt conventional access security practices with AI-driven least privilege solutions. The funding is being allocated to accelerate product development, drive growth, and deliver unmatched value to customers. This investment also cements Apono’s position as a leader in the identity security sector.

As part of its growth strategy, Apono strengthened its leadership team by appointing Dan Parelskin as Senior Vice President of Sales, Stephen Lowing as Vice President of Marketing, and most recently, Arik Kfir as Vice President of Research and Development. With over 20 years of expertise in engineering, system and software architecture, and leadership, Kfir brings significant value to Apono. He previously held senior roles at Zesty, Qubex, and Zscaler. In his new role, Kfir will focus on enhancing the scalability of Apono’s platform and driving its research and development initiatives to align with strategic objectives. These leadership additions position Apono to meet the growing demand for cloud-privileged access solutions across diverse markets.

The company also unveiled a major update to its Apono Cloud Access Platform. This update enables automatic discovery, assessment, and revocation of standing access to cloud resources. With comprehensive visibility, seamless permission revocation, and automated Just-in-Time, Just-Enough Access, the platform helps organizations mitigate critical risks while fostering innovation within secure operational frameworks.

In December, Apono gained recognition in the IDC Innovators: Software Development Life-Cycle Identity and Access, 2024 report, which highlights emerging vendors offering groundbreaking technologies to address existing challenges. Apono’s use of AI and context-driven insights to enforce role-based access controls and dynamically adjust permissions earned it this acknowledgment. Following its presence at AWS re:Invent, Apono was also honored with the Winter 2024 Intellyx Digital Innovator Award, celebrating its innovative approaches to solving complex challenges in the digital landscape.

“In a cloud development world where permissions are often unused and identities can lie dormant, Apono offers DevOps teams and engineers a cloud identity and access management platform that allows them to embed ‘access flow’ permissions with just-in-time policy monitoring that dynamically validates least-privilege user access in the workflow context of the application,” said Jason English, director and principal analyst, Intellyx, in SiliconANGLE from AWS re:Invent.

Additionally, Apono was featured in the 2024 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Privileged Access Management as a sample vendor for Just-in-Time Privilege (JITP) tools. This recognition highlights Apono’s innovative role in addressing privileged access management risks. Gartner emphasized the growing adoption of JITP tools due to their ease of use and implementation, aligning with Apono’s mission to deliver effective and user-friendly access management solutions.

“Apono’s fearless development team is at the heart of our achievements,” said CEO of Apono, Rom Carmel. “Their dedication and innovation drive our mission to provide secure, automated access management solutions. By developing cutting-edge technology, we empower organizations to manage access efficiently and securely. Our solutions streamline access control, reduce risks, and enhance operational efficiency, allowing our clients to focus on their core business objectives.”

For more information, visit the Apono website here: www.apono.io.

The post Apono’s 2024 Achievements Set the Stage for Innovative Cloud Access Management in 2025 appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

Remote and hybrid working models have become the norm for many since the COVID-19 pandemic. One US study found that 62% of respondents work in the office full-time; a slight decline from 66% in 2023. Meanwhile 27% are fully hybrid, compared to 26% in 2023. And 11% are fully remote, an increase from seven percent in 2023. That the changes in these figures are quite slight suggests that working habits are stabilising and that, broadly speaking, organizations have settled into a working model that works for them.

For those that adopt the hybrid approach, there are many benefits. Not having to travel to work so often – or at all –opens up wider recruitment options for both for employers and candidates. Findings and opinions vary, but some studies suggest that employees working from home are more productive than those in the office. Less stress and better work-life balance are also key benefits often cited.

This change in working habits has implications for how organizations approach fraud prevention. Remote workers are not subject to the same traditional physical controls of an office environment. This affords rogue employees more opportunities to exploit consumer data. Where workers are working on their own devices (for firms that operate Bring Your Own Device BYOD model), there is a risk that devices may not be monitored or protected in the same ways as other company-owned devices.

It should be noted that no correlation has been drawn between the rise in remote working and the rise in employee fraud. Nevertheless, organizations need to educate themselves on the nature of additional risks and review and adapt their approach to fraud prevention accordingly.

Failing to do so can lead to far-reaching effects:

Financial losses: In the US, losses from employee fraud contribute to the more than $2 billion that individuals and organizations in the US lose each year due to cyber fraud. Globally, occupational fraud losses reached $42 billion in 2023, with a median loss of $150,000. 

Fraudulent activity by employees tends to result in high losses because the perpetrator aims to exploit a gap in the organization’s defences as quickly as possible before they are detected. 

Regulatory breaches: Organizations that fail to detect and respond to employee fraud breaches are likely to be reprimanded by their relevant regulator(s). Repercussions can include reprimands and significant penalties including fines.

Impact on brand and reputation: Regulators sometimes publicise the sanctions applied and firms may find that they face damage to their brand and reputation as a result.

A new approach to fraud prevention

It’s clear that organizations need to reform their fraud prevention systems and processes to accommodate hybrid and remote working. To establish how to do this, it’s important to examine how employee fraud can occur. 

Rogue employees can:

  • Legitimately access a consumer’s profile and then associate it with another device and email that they possess. Using these credentials, they can access consumer accounts or facilitate fund transfers
  • Direct unauthorized payments or transfers to themselves by using other employees accounts 
  • Use their own devices to access customer records, take pictures of sensitive information displayed on the screen and send the data via encrypted messaging apps or personal email accounts. 

Many organizations will assume that relying on standard fraud prevention vendor solutions is sufficient protection. However, these systems work on the principal of detecting when a user goes beyond their prescribed access level by referring to the user ID and the stated policies and permissions. But where organizations have employees working remotely, this is not sufficient, and organizations need to adopt more sophisticated technologies to detect breaches. 

These new solutions derive data from a number of sources, including:

  • EDR data (endpoint telemetry, user accounts, SSIDs (when available), IP addresses and activity logs)
  • Application server logs – records of customer profile changes made by employees, consumer portal access logs including transaction data, device data on accounts and IP addresses
  • Roles Based Access Control (RBAC) & Attributes Based Access Control (ABAC) data. 

Graph analytics can then make connections between employees, devices, consumer accounts and actions. Links can be made between user IDs, device digital certificates, device types (BYOD vs provisioned) and IP addresses to identify unusual activity or interactions, such as customer profile changes or payment initiations by employees originating from the same or proximal IP addresses as those associated with employees. 

In addition, Temporal Analysis can put together a sequence of events to identify unusual activity, such as repeated changes to consumer information across accounts, systems accessed outside of normal working hours, unusual usage patterns of network connections (Wi-Fi and SSIDs), and use of unknown devices on consumer accounts related to an employee. Crucially, it can review the sequence of events to identify where profile changes were followed by unauthorized access. 

Through reviewing this data, the system can generate alerts based on the analysis. These alerts can notify the organization of red flags such as: unusual customer profile modifications, unauthorized attempts on consumer accounts from IP addresses not associated with the consumer account or multiple password reset requests from consumer accounts after employee modifications. Elevated access or privilege escalation attempts by employees, high-risk employee activities outside normal business hours and role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) policy violations at the user, device, IP address level, can also be detected.

By identifying these red flags, organizations have the best chance of being notified of potential issues before fraud has occurred, enabling them to investigate further. The technology can build a picture of what’s occurred, ensuring that the organization has all the required information to take action if necessary. 

The world of hybrid working means that organizations need to rethink how they approach fraud detection. ‘Traditional’ solutions are no longer sophisticated enough and, considering the potential significant consequences of fraud, organizations will want peace of mind that they are well protected. End-to-end solutions which review the existing defence and policies, identifies weaknesses and deploys technology to address them will mean that stringent measures are in place and that remote working remains a safe and viable option.

The post Adapting fraud prevention for the hybrid working world appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

A new report from Securin highlights the weaknesses affecting Industrial Control Systems and Operational Technology at a time when cyberattacks on these sectors are escalating at an alarming rate. 

According to the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), critical infrastructure encompasses systems and assets that are so essential to the United States that their disruption would significantly impact national security, economic stability, public health, or safety.  

From 2023 – 2024, critical infrastructure worldwide faced an estimated 13  cyberattacks every second, amounting  to over 420 million incidents. The cyber-attacks that we have seen throughout recent years highlight just how important it is for critical infrastructure systems across the country to update their cybersecurity practices. 

This is why Securin,  a leader in proactive cybersecurity solutions and continuous threat monitoring, recently released its Critical  Infrastructure Overview 2024 report that examined over 1,700 attacks on critical infrastructure. This  report highlights the vulnerabilities plaguing vital industries, including energy, manufacturing, water and healthcare. These sectors are increasingly targeted by sophisticated threat actors, making it a collective priority for private and public enterprises to address. 

The top takeaways from this report include: 

1.Sectors That Face the Most Risk – The most vulnerable critical infrastructure sectors, as identified by  Securin’s report, are manufacturing, healthcare, water and wastewater utilities and energy. These sectors face escalating risks due to a mix of misconfigurations, a growing  attack surface and legacy systems. 

2.Attack Vectors –  Threat actors are exploiting poor security hygiene and legacy systems  to gain entry into critical systems. Vulnerability and misconfiguration exploits remain the leading attack vector (30%), followed by compromised credentials (22.8%) and spear phishing via links or attachments (19%).  

3.Threat Actors – Leading attackers targeting critical infrastructure include nation-state actors from countries like Iran and Russia. Groups such as Sandworm and BlackCat have taken advantage of outdated software and unpatched vulnerabilities, frequently using geopolitical tensions to concentrate their attacks on critical sectors. 

4.Common Weakness Enumeration (CWEs) and Common Vulnerabilities – The report highlights persistent vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure systems, including Cross-Site Scripting (CWE-79), Exposure of Sensitive Information (CWE-200), and SQL Injection (CWE-89). These  vulnerabilities highlight the importance of secure by design software development practices and thorough patch management. 

The stakes for critical infrastructure continue to rise, and the relentless targeting by threat actors demands urgent action. This is why the importance of modernization efforts cannot be understated. Especially when many critical infrastructure sectors extensively use legacy systems for their day-to-day operations. Many legacy systems are vulnerable to inter-system attacks due to their lack of strong defenses compared to the cloud-based platforms they are linked to, making U.S. infrastructure organizations highly susceptible to exploitation.  

It is crucial for all organizations—especially those in critical infrastructure sectors—to modernize their outdated systems and adopt cybersecurity managed services. Collaboration across cybersecurity leaders, governments and industries is essential to safeguard these vital sectors. With the right collaboration and decisive action, we can protect the systems that underpin our society and ensure a more secure future. 

The post Safeguarding Vital Sectors: The Need for Enhanced Security Practices in Critical Infrastructure Amid Rising Cyberattacks appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

BCR Cyber, a leading provider of comprehensive cybersecurity training and job placement services, and the Maryland Association of Community Colleges (MACC), the advocate and unified voice for Maryland’s 16 community colleges, are pleased to announce that Governor Wes Moore has included a $1.5 million in his 2025-2026 budget proposal for the Cyber Workforce Accelerator (CWA) as a part of his economic growth agenda.

These funds will be utilized by the CWA to build cyber ranges at Maryland’s community college campuses and boost the state’s cybersecurity workforce. Developed by MACC and BCR Cyber, the CWA provides all 16 of Maryland’s community colleges with access to BCR Cyber Series 3000 cyber ranges that deliver advanced experiential training and education technology to train and certify thousands of entry-level IT and cyber practitioners.

“We are extremely grateful to the Moore administration for this investment which will help accelerate the state’s cybersecurity workforce development efforts and create well-paying and lasting career opportunities for Marylanders,” says Michael Spector, President of BCR Cyber. “Together with the Maryland Association of Community Colleges, we will drastically increase the ability to serve thousands of Maryland’s community college cyber students and trainees.”

For more than seven years, BCR Cyber has worked with the Maryland Department of Labor Employment Advancement Right Now (EARN) program and Maryland community colleges to establish an IT and cyber workforce development pipeline. More than 2,000 Maryland residents have been trained, certified, and 83 percent placed through the pipeline. Participants are drawn from across the state, are generally unemployed or under-employed, and come from varied backgrounds and demographics. Persons of color represented 68 percent of the program participants, and 47 percent were women.

As a function of this effort, a public-private consortium created by BCR Cyber of 35+ cybersecurity companies and government agencies will steer course content development and recruit entry-level employees trained at the community college cyber ranges. Each of these entities have pledged significant leveraged resources to this project.

BCR Cyber has also established a wide range of strategic relationships with state and federal IT departments, allowing them to deliver cutting-edge cybersecurity training to their employees. Collaborating closely with these government entities, BCR Cyber is enabling them to strengthen their cybersecurity posture while fostering a culture of continuous learning and improvement.

Additionally, BCR Cyber holds exclusive responsibility for conducting technical proficiency testing for third-party assessment organizations (3PAOs), as required by the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP). BCR Cyber testing ensures these organizations meet the standards necessary to assess and authorize cloud service providers for federal agencies.

For more information about BCR Cyber visit www.bcrcyber.com  

The post BCR Cyber and Maryland Association of Community Colleges Allocated $1.5 Million State Investment as Part of Maryland Governor’s Proposed Economic Growth Agenda appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

In the world of data protection, trust is everything. When faced with a disaster, ensuring your business continuity depends on a vendor’s ability to restore your data. This is the basis of data restoration guarantees, which promise financial compensation as a coverage if there is a failure in recovering your lost data. 

But are these guarantees simply a sales tactic, or are they actually a viable insurance policy?

Back in 2005, we introduced our £1 million guarantee for data restoration. This was a big deal at the time, providing much needed reassurance to early adopters of cloud backup solutions (or online backup, as we called it then). The guarantee was backed by our insurer – demonstrating their trust and confidence in our recovery capabilities.

The recent surge in ransomware attacks has brought data restoration guarantees back into the spotlight. Backup software vendors are now offering multi-million dollar guarantees, hoping to win over customers worried about their data’s vulnerability. However, the viability and limitations of these guarantees need to be considered.

Are they a good idea for vendors? 

We ultimately decided to phase out our guarantee. While the financial safety and risk mitigation it offered attracted new customers, these benefits were less relevant for larger businesses. For large companies with turnovers in the hundreds of millions or billions, £1 million (or $10 million) simply isn’t enough compensation to offset the potential data loss.

But are guarantees still a good offering? In our experience they are a good initial hook, but they aren’t a major factor in the decision-making process. Customers were (and still are) focused on factors like reliability and recovery speed, beyond the attention-grabbing headline ‘guarantee’.

Are guarantees beneficial for customers? 

Large payouts might sound appealing, but the conditions for claiming them can be strict. Often, these guarantees only apply to premium support tiers and specific configurations, leaving many users out in the cold. Additionally, the significance of recovering the data itself is often far more valuable than the promised financial payout.

Guarantees vs. insurance? 

Data restoration guarantees are not a replacement for business interruption or other insurance policies. Guarantees offer limited compensation under specific circumstances, while insurance provides broader coverage for various data loss and continuity scenarios. 

Are the terms of the guarantee reasonable? Is the figure worthwhile? These are the key questions to ask when considering claiming on a guarantee rather than insurance.

Making an informed decision

Data restoration guarantees seem like a resounding statement of confidence that a solution will never fail. However, in practice these guarantees have limitations in their effectiveness and the ability to claim against them. As a result, we recommend that businesses rely on insurance and not guarantees. 

Outside of an initial hook, these guarantees are not the most important consideration. Instead, focus on researching the specifics of a vendor’s backup solution – track record, recovery speed, security measures and customer support. The best backup guarantee is a vendor with a proven ability to protect and restore your data when disaster hits.

 

The post Do backup vendor guarantees pay off? appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

The reliance on passwords as the cornerstone of digital authentication is slowly waning as organizations pivot towards more secure and user-friendly methods. One of these is passwordless authentication—a technology that removes passwords from the equation entirely, replacing them with advanced methods like digital certificates, biometrics, and tokenization. 

Despite its promise, adoption of passwordless authentication remains in its infancy, with only 7% of organizations fully embracing it, according to Portnox’s recently published CISO Perspectives for 2025 report. Major obstacles include the high cost of implementation and employee resistance. However, the landscape is shifting as both security leaders and technology providers push this innovation forward.

Why Passwordless?

Compromised passwords continue to be the Achilles’ heel of network security. According to Portnox’s recent report, a staggering 81% of CISOs suspect that breached credentials are the primary enabler of security incidents.These breaches not only expose sensitive data but also erode trust and carry significant financial repercussions.

Passwordless authentication mitigates these risks by eliminating passwords altogether, replacing them with stronger alternatives. This shift doesn’t just bolster security; it simplifies user experiences by reducing reliance on password creation, recall, and management. As a result, 32% of CISOs surveyed have already begun or completed passwordless implementation, and 63% are planning or open to it.

The Security and Productivity Payoff

Passwordless authentication is poised to revolutionize organizational security by addressing the vulnerabilities associated with traditional passwords. By eliminating passwords, companies can significantly lower the risk of breaches, a concern for 81% of CISOs. 

The benefits of passwordless authentication extend beyond just security enhancements as demonstrated by the opinions of the 200 CISOs surveyed in the report:

  • Stronger Access Control: Over half of CISOs (52%) anticipate improved access management, effectively reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Mitigating Human Error: By removing passwords, organizations eliminate vulnerabilities like password reuse, weak credentials, and susceptibility to phishing attacks—a concern for 47% of CISOs.
  • Enhanced Employee Experience: Half of CISOs expect passwordless systems to offer smoother authentication, improving user satisfaction and reducing frustration.
  • Operational Efficiency: Simplified authentication processes can enhance productivity for 42% of organizations and reduce IT support costs by 40%.

The convergence of security upgrades and operational efficiency makes passwordless authentication a compelling proposition.

Barriers to Adoption

Despite its promise, several challenges stand in the way of widespread adoption:

1.Cost Concerns: Implementing new technologies can strain budgets, and 51% of CISOs cite costs as a barrier to adoption. Organizations must balance the upfront investment with the long-term savings associated with lower IT support costs and reduced breach incidents.

2.Employee Resistance: Resistance to change is a natural human response, and 45% of CISOs fear pushback from employees. In addition, 53% worry about usability issues, such as employees being locked out during the transition phase.

3.Complexity of Deployment: For 49% of CISOs, lack of vendor support and concerns about seamless integration into existing systems remain significant hurdles.

4.Vendor Ecosystem: The passwordless authentication market is still maturing, and finding reliable vendors capable of addressing specific organizational needs adds another layer of complexity.

Future Perspectives and Strategic Planning

As we look to the future, passwordless authentication is positioned to be a cornerstone of advanced cybersecurity strategies. Its capability to counteract sophisticated cyber threats makes it an indispensable element for proactive security planning. Organizations should assess their current security frameworks and prioritize the integration of passwordless solutions to stay ahead in the dynamic digital environment. 

Adopting passwordless authentication requires a structured approach:

  • Build the Business Case: Security team leaders  need to communicate the long-term value of passwordless solutions, including enhanced protection, user experience, and cost benefits. Showcasing how it aligns with business goals can help secure leadership buy-in.
  • Pilot Projects: Launching a pilot within a smaller group allows organizations to identify and resolve potential issues before a broader rollout.
  • Employee Education: Educating employees about the benefits and functionality of passwordless systems can reduce resistance. Training sessions and open communication are crucial to ensure a smooth transition.
  • Vendor Selection: Partnering with vendors that offer robust support and seamless integration capabilities is critical to overcoming technical challenges.
  • Iterative Implementation: A phased implementation strategy can minimize disruption and allow time for adjustments.

The Passwordless Frontier

The emergence of passwordless authentication signals a transformative shift in cybersecurity.  Organizations that embrace passwordless strategies stand to gain not only stronger security but also a competitive edge in fostering productivity and user satisfaction.

As CISOs increasingly recognize the limitations of passwords and the potential of passwordless solutions, the roadblocks that currently hinder adoption will likely fade. The question is no longer if organizations will adopt passwordless authentication, but when they will take the leap.

The journey to a passwordless future may be fraught with challenges, but its promise of improved security, efficiency, and user experience makes it the next frontier worth exploring. While still in its early days, the momentum is undeniable.

 

The post Passwordless Authentication: The Next Frontier appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

In the rapidly evolving iGaming industry, platforms such as online casinos, sportsbooks, and jackpot services have become prime targets for cybercriminals. These malicious actors aim to exploit vulnerabilities to steal funds, abuse promotional offers, and compromise both player and operator accounts.

To achieve their goals, attackers deploy a variety of techniques and tactics, each with its own level of sophistication and impact. While many traditional methods of attack – such as brute force, phishing, and trojans – continue to plague the industry, the growing prevalence of credential stuffing is particularly concerning. Over the past few years, we have identified a troubling trend: attackers are increasingly leveraging credential stuffing as one of the most effective vectors for targeting iGaming platforms. This type of attack thrives on the massive volume of leaked credentials available on the dark web, combined with widespread password reuse – a behavior that is alarmingly common.

At SOFTSWISS, we understand the critical challenges faced by iGaming operators and stakeholders in defending their platforms from increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks. With years of experience in the industry, we have observed firsthand how threats like credential stuffing not only jeopardize security but also impact reputation, player trust, and overall business performance.

Given its prevalence and impact, we believe it is essential to address credential stuffing directly and collaborate with the broader iGaming community to mitigate its risks. By sharing insights from our experience and practical solutions, we aim to empower operators, security professionals, and stakeholders to recognize, prevent, and effectively respond to these growing threats.

Key Cyber Threat Vectors in iGaming

To build a comprehensive understanding of how cybercriminals exploit weaknesses in iGaming platforms, it’s essential to analyze the primary methods they rely on. These approaches range from traditional tactics to increasingly sophisticated strategies, each presenting distinct challenges for operators:

  • Account Theft: Exploiting stolen credentials to gain unauthorized access.
  • Credential Stuffing: Using breached username and password pairs in bulk to automate login attempts.
  • Brute Force Attacks: Systematically guessing passwords until one works.
  • Trojans/Stealers: Infecting devices with malware designed to capture sensitive data.

Another common vector involves scams disguised as legitimate tools:

  • Deceptive Third-Party Services: Fake platforms claiming to simplify data visualization – such as allegedly helpful “tracking software” for iGaming affiliates – but in reality collecting user credentials
  • Fake Mirror Sites: Counterfeit versions of legitimate iGaming websites, used to deceive users into submitting their credentials.

Additionally, multi-accounting strategies pose a significant threat:

  • Account Farming: Generating new accounts to exploit bonuses.
  • Stolen Account Abuse: Using compromised accounts for fraudulent activities.

Among these, credential stuffing stands out as one of the most damaging attack vectors in 2024. By leveraging enormous troves of leaked credentials sourced from the dark web, attackers can infiltrate multiple user accounts with minimal effort. In the following sections, we will delve deeper into how credential stuffing works, why it is so effective in the iGaming environment, the specific damages it causes, and effective strategies for protection and mitigation.

Understanding Credential Stuffing

Credential stuffing is a cyberattack in which attackers rely on automated tools to test large volumes of stolen username/password pairs across multiple platforms. This method thrives on the common habit of password reuse: if a user’s credentials leak from one platform and they employ the same combination elsewhere, attackers can gain access to those other accounts with ease.

Rapid Growth and Availability of Credentials

The surge in data breaches has led to an abundance of compromised credentials available on dark web forums. These ready-made lists, often containing millions of username-password pairs, make it easier than ever for attackers to target iGaming platforms. The problem is exacerbated by the continuous discovery of new data leaks and the willingness of users to reuse passwords across different sites-allowing even relatively unsophisticated attackers to break into accounts on casinos, sportsbooks, and affiliate dashboards.

Double Risk for iGaming Industry

In iGaming, the stakes are higher. Unlike many mainstream services, compromised accounts here can grant direct access to funds, valuable loyalty rewards, or sensitive player information. Moreover, not only players but also operator employees and back-office administrators may be targeted, further increasing the impact of a successful attack.

Root Causes of Credential Stuffing Success

  • Password Reuse: Users often employ the same password across multiple sites for convenience.
  • Large-Scale Data Breaches: Massive databases of stolen credentials are readily available to malicious actors.
  • Low Barrier to Entry: Credential stuffing tools are inexpensive, widely available, and easy to use, making these attacks attractive even to low-skilled cybercriminals.

 

Picture 1. How credential checkers for different services work

Consequences for Players and Operators

For compromised account holders:

  • Financial Losses: Attackers can empty balances, steal winnings, and redeem promotional credits.
  • Personal Exposure: Sensitive information (e.g., names, emails, addresses) may be leaked or sold.
  • Further Fraud: Account hijacking can lead to extortion or blackmail, threatening to expose personal details or gambling habits.

For iGaming service operators:

  • Reputational Damage: Breached casinos and betting platforms risk losing player trust, resulting in churn and reduced revenue.
  • Legal and Financial Liability: Operators may face regulatory fines, chargebacks, and lawsuits from aggrieved customers.
  • Competitive Disadvantage: Stolen accounts can be resold to competitors or used to infiltrate affiliate programs, skewing marketing campaigns and incentives.

Common Misdiagnoses and Pitfalls

A frequent mistake in combating credential stuffing is misidentifying it as a DDoS attack

Because credential stuffing can generate large volumes of login attempts, it’s easy to focus solely on the surge in requests and mistake it for a conventional overload attempt. If the platform remains operational, a support team might assume it’s merely a failed DDoS or a user traffic spike due to a marketing campaign. This misunderstanding can prevent the implementation of necessary countermeasures, allowing attackers to continue compromising accounts undetected.

Infrastructure Overloads and Operational Strain

In addition to the risk of incorrect classification, large-scale automated login attempts can impose heavy loads on authentication systems and backend infrastructures. Sudden surges in credential validation requests degrade performance, cause production incidents, and can lead to downtime. Under these conditions, engineers scramble to restore normalcy, while users face delays, errors, or outages. Over time, repeated incidents erode player trust, harm brand reputation, and diminish user satisfaction-all of which can negatively impact critical business metrics like conversions, registrations, and first-time deposits (FTDs).

Lack of Preventative Measures and Business Trade-Offs

Another pitfall is the absence of proactive security measures-such as CAPTCHAs, MFA, or advanced bot protection. In our experience, this reluctance often stems from concerns that additional security steps may introduce friction into the carefully optimized Customer Journey Map. Every extra authentication prompt or verification challenge potentially elongates the path from a visitor’s first interaction with the site to their initial deposit. In highly competitive markets, operators frequently prioritize maximizing conversion rates of their marketing campaigns and ensuring a seamless onboarding flow. The fear is that any added friction-be it a CAPTCHA at sign-up or MFA at login-could deter new players, reduce promotional effectiveness, and ultimately lower the ratio of players who reach that critical first-time deposit milestone.

From a unit economics perspective, each additional step in the user journey can influence key performance indicators like Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) and Lifetime Value (LTV). While more robust security measures offer long-term benefits in terms of trust and brand reputation, operators may weigh these gains against the potential short-term downturn in conversions, registrations, or FTDs. As a result, they may opt for fewer preventative measures to maintain business agility and immediate competitiveness, even though this choice leaves the platform more vulnerable to credential stuffing attacks.

 

Picture 2. This is what a successful Credentials stuffing attack pattern looks like on the charts – if you don’t take preventive defense measures

Importance of Post-Attack Analysis

Halting an ongoing credential stuffing attack is not the end of the story. If attackers have successfully accessed a range of accounts, they may now possess information allowing them to exploit these compromised credentials over the long term. Even if no suspicious transactions are immediately apparent, adversaries can silently observe these accounts, waiting for favorable conditions to strike again. They might periodically revisit accounts to check for newly deposited funds, watch for incoming promotional credits, or leverage accrued loyalty points and bonuses. Without thorough post-incident analysis, operators risk overlooking these hidden threats, ultimately giving attackers the opportunity to profit when circumstances are most advantageous.

Informed by our experience with iGaming operators and incident analysis, we believe that continuous monitoring and targeted countermeasures may sometimes be more suitable than drastic, broad-stroke responses. For example, operators may consider forced password resets as an emergency measure – an action that can potentially prompt negative reactions and impact player trust. However, in some scenarios it may be more effective to explore alternative approaches, such as implementing advanced anomaly detection, scrutinizing unusual withdrawal requests, or temporarily flagging suspicious accounts for further review.

Additionally, analyzing patterns in attacker behavior, user activity logs, and infrastructure metrics can yield valuable insights. By identifying which accounts were compromised, understanding how credential pairs were tested, and recognizing common characteristics of such attacks (e.g., patterns in geolocation or timing), operators can more accurately adjust and refine their preventive measures. Over time, this data-driven approach enhances platform resilience without imposing unnecessary burdens on legitimate players. By maintaining vigilant oversight after an incident, operators can find the right balance between bolstering security and preserving a seamless player experience. Continuous evaluation, pattern analysis, and selective verification ensure that even after stopping an attack, the platform remains prepared to detect and deter future attempts at abuse-thereby sustaining player confidence and satisfaction.

 

Picture 3. How the beginning and fading of an attack can be displayed on charts

In essence, effective post-incident strategy extends beyond simply ending the attack. A proactive, well-considered approach-based on our own experience and observations-not only safeguards player interests but also reinforces confidence in the platform’s long-term reliability and integrity.

By acknowledging these pitfalls – misidentifying attacks, underestimating infrastructure stress, downplaying proactive security due to perceived business trade-offs, and neglecting post-attack analysis-operators can take a more informed and balanced approach. Implementing user-friendly yet effective security measures not only mitigates credential stuffing risks but also supports long-term stability, player trust, and sustainable growth.

How SOFTSWISS Combated Credential Stuffing

This fall, one of our clients experienced a credential stuffing attack that leveraged more than 1,000,000 IP addresses originating from diverse geolocations. By utilizing such a vast and globally distributed pool of IPs, the attackers effectively bypassed rate limits and other basic technical safeguards.

Once the incident was detected, our response teams promptly stepped in. Through careful analysis, we identified a specific attack pattern and implemented targeted measures to block it. Leveraging our tailored approaches and extensive experience in combating similar attacks, we uncovered behavioral patterns characteristic of a botnet network. By analyzing these patterns, such as synchronized login attempts and traffic anomalies, we dynamically adjusted our response to neutralize the ongoing threat.

After some time, the attackers adjusted their approach and launched another attempt. Our systems quickly recognized the altered behavior – including changes in IP distribution and user-agent strings – and proactively refined our defenses by introducing additional smart restrictions tailored to high-risk geolocations. These adjustments ensured that legitimate users could continue to access the platform without interruption while significantly raising the barriers for attackers.

The result was a successful defense, illustrating the importance of continuous monitoring, timely intervention, and the ability to adapt strategies in response to evolving threats. This case demonstrates the value of combining advanced threat detection methodologies, big data analytics, and a tailored incident response framework to stay ahead of evolving cyberattacks.

How to Protect Against Credential Stuffing

Defending against credential stuffing attacks calls for a strategic blend of measures. Operators must balance security requirements with usability, performance, and business goals. While implementing additional safeguards can introduce friction and potentially affect certain metrics, it is often preferable to address these trade-offs early rather than face more severe consequences later. By selecting and combining the right measures – and adjusting them over time – operators can significantly reduce the risk and impact of credential stuffing attacks.

1. CAPTCHA

Introducing CAPTCHA at the authentication stage is an effective way to complicate and increase the cost of executing credential stuffing attacks for cybercriminals. This approach significantly raises the difficulty threshold for large-scale automated authentication attempts.

•Limitations:

  • CAPTCHAs can inconvenience legitimate users, potentially reducing conversion rates.
  • Some players may fail CAPTCHAs due to technical issues, accessibility challenges, or user error, impacting user satisfaction and key performance indicators.

•Bypassing Techniques:

Human or automated solver services and advancing AI-based solvers mean CAPTCHAs aren’t foolproof.

•Targeted Use Cases:

Consider deploying CAPTCHAs selectively, for example, only in suspicious geolocations that do not align with your primary market. This approach preserves a smooth experience for most players while limiting automated attacks from non-targeted regions.

CAPTCHAs can also be enabled as an emergency measure during an ongoing attack, buying valuable time for the incident response team to identify and block the underlying pattern.

 

Picture 4. What a CAPTCHA that is positioned to be AI-proof looks like

Although perhaps in reality AI wouldn’t be able to bypass this kind of CAPTCHA 🙂

 

2. Rate Limits

Rate limiting the number of requests from a single IP, ASN, or other fingerprints can curb automated attacks by slowing down login attempts. This is a relatively simple measure but may be insufficient on its own.

•Challenges:

Attackers use large botnets and compromised devices to rotate through many IP addresses, easily circumventing simple rate limits.

Regular tuning is essential: large marketing campaigns, new market entries, or spikes in legitimate traffic can trigger false positives and degrade user experience if rate limits are set too aggressively.

•Adjustments and Contextual Rules:

Consider dynamic rate limits that adapt based on user behavior patterns, geolocation, device type, or referral source. This approach reduces the risk of blocking genuine players while still hindering attackers.

3. Bot Management Solutions

Advanced bot management tools offered by providers like HUMAN, Cloudflare, Imperva, and Datadome use multiple attributes-HTTP headers, browser fingerprints, user interactions, behavioral analysis-to distinguish legitimate users from automated scripts.

•Pros:

High accuracy in detecting and filtering out malicious traffic.

Can significantly reduce the volume of credential stuffing attempts that reach the authentication endpoint.

•Drawbacks:

  • Additional cost and complexity.
  • False positives may occur, blocking real players, and require fine-tuning.

•Continuous Improvement:

Maintaining and updating these solutions regularly ensures that as attackers evolve their techniques, the bot management system remains effective.

 

Picture 5. Total amount of traffic in the Bot Management solution interface

 

Picture 6. The volume of traffic to the authorization form in the Bot Management solution interface, where a huge  rate of automatic connections during the attack

4. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)

Implementing MFA – such as one-time passwords delivered via email or authenticator apps – can drastically reduce the success rate of credential stuffing attacks. By requiring more than just a username and password, you significantly raise the barrier for attackers. Once they realize that additional factors are needed to gain access, the value of their stolen credentials diminishes.

Considerations:

  • Usability vs. Security: Triggering MFA only after a correct username/password entry enhances the user experience, though it may reveal the account’s existence to potential attackers.
  • Adaptive Scenarios: To minimize friction, consider prompting MFA only when a user logs in from a new device or an unfamiliar environment. Supporting modern authentication methods like passkeys can further streamline the process, offering an alternative to traditional OTPs.

In practice, balancing security and convenience may require different approaches for various user segments. For example, in our products, MFA is integrated by default. While it remains optional – albeit strongly recommended – for players, we make it mandatory for operator back-office accounts. This flexible model ensures that critical backend operations receive the highest level of protection, while players retain control over their login experience.

5. Monitoring and Mitigation

Effective monitoring and ongoing mitigation efforts are critical. Simple yet informative metrics can quickly alert operators to unusual login activity, enabling a prompt response before attackers achieve their goals.

•Key Metrics:

  • Ratio of successful to failed logins.
  • Spikes in failed logins from non-target geolocations.
  • Sudden increases in failed logins from mobile devices or specific referral links (e.g., marketing campaigns).

•Contextual Understanding:

Marketing promotions or campaigns to re-engage inactive players can cause traffic surges and false alarms. Refining alert thresholds and analyzing patterns in traffic can help distinguish legitimate marketing-induced spikes from malicious automation.

Picture 7. Number of successful logins

 

Picture 8. Number of unsuccessful logins

6. Infrastructure Load Management

By closely monitoring login attempts and user activity, operators can quickly detect abnormal authentication spikes indicative of a credential stuffing campaign. Early detection allows for timely measures – such as introducing CAPTCHAs or blocking suspicious IP ranges – before performance is seriously impacted. Continuous monitoring also prevents attackers from leveraging automated login attempts as a kind of “mini-DDoS,” straining authentication systems and degrading the overall player experience.

7. AI-Driven Detection and Prevention of Attacks

Based on our expertise, we believe that artificial intelligence (AI) is not only one of the most effective tools in combating credential stuffing and gaming fraud, but also the foundation upon which the future of protection against such threats will evolve. AI offers dynamic, adaptive defenses capable of addressing the constantly evolving tactics of attackers and the emerging challenges within the gaming industry.

How AI helps prevent attacks:

  • Adaptive Learning: AI algorithms continuously evolve by training on new data. This enables them to recognize both known and emerging attack patterns, keeping pace with changes in attackers’ methods.
  • Precision and Scalability: Automated analysis of vast data volumes allows AI to detect subtle connections and patterns that might go unnoticed during manual review. This scalability enables systems to process millions of requests without compromising performance.
  • Behavioral and Pattern Analysis: AI leverages big data to identify connections between devices, accounts, and their activity history. For instance, if a device has previously been involved in fraudulent activities, it can be flagged as suspicious and its access restricted. This reduces the burden on security teams, minimizes the risk of compromise, and ensures seamless access for legitimate users.
  • Reduction of False Positives: Instead of imposing broad restrictions that could inconvenience legitimate users, AI responds to specific behavioral signals. This minimizes disruptions for genuine players and protects key business metrics by preserving trust and loyalty.

Benefits for iGaming Platforms:

  1. Enhancing Player Trust: Targeted blocking of suspicious devices eliminates false positives, providing seamless access for legitimate users.
  2. Reducing Operational Risks: Proactive threat blocking reduces the need for manual analysis and response, allowing teams to focus on addressing more significat threats to the operational business.
  3. Preemptive Advantage: AI-driven systems not only react to attacks but also prevent them, ensuring stable and secure platform operations.

By integrating AI into security frameworks, iGaming platforms gain a powerful tool to safeguard against credential stuffing and gaming fraud. This intelligent and adaptive approach not only protects existing infrastructure but also actively prevents future threats, preserving player trust and maintaining key business performance metrics.

In practice, no single measure can fully prevent credential stuffing, but a layered, adaptive approach – combination of thoughtful rate limits, selective CAPTCHA usage, sophisticated bot management, and vigilant monitoring – significantly strengthens defenses. Over time, continuous analysis and refinement of these strategies help operators maintain platform security, protect player interests, and uphold the trust and integrity that form the backbone of the iGaming industry.

Basic Steps to Stop a Credential Stuffing Attack

1.Analyze the Attack and Identify the Pattern:

Look for specific indicators that define the attack’s characteristics. These can include automated user agents (e.g., “Go-http-client/1.1” or “python-requests/2.28.2”), identical or uncommon user agents, JS3-JS4 browser fingerprints, large pools of IP addresses generating a high volume of connections, abnormal HTTP headers, or insights derived from bot management analytics.

2.Implement Blocking Rules or Adjust Security Measures:

Once the pattern is identified, create rules or refine existing defenses – such as adjusting rate limits, enabling CAPTCHA or JS challenges, or tuning bot management settings – to block the malicious traffic effectively.

3.Monitor the Results:

Continuously observe the platform’s behavior, confirming whether the implemented countermeasures have successfully mitigated the attack and ensuring no unintended impact on legitimate users.

4.Assess Impact and Take Remedial Actions:

After stabilizing the environment, evaluate the overall damage caused by the attack. Identify compromised accounts and carefully consider whether it’s appropriate to inform affected players about the unauthorized access resulting from the credential stuffing incident. Additionally, review which additional protective measures might be implemented to enhance the platform’s resilience against future attacks.

Insights from SOFTSWISS Experience

Drawing on many years of involvement in the iGaming industry, we have identified key principles applicable to defending against credential stuffing attacks. The following concise insights combine brief headings with detailed context, guiding operators toward more efficient and data-driven protective strategies.

1.Simple Signals, Tangible Results

Detecting and blocking straightforward indicators – such as suspicious user agents, malicious IP addresses, or anomalous geolocations-can significantly impede attackers’ progress at minimal cost.

2.Balancing Effort and Expense

By increasing the complexity and cost of attacks (e.g., CAPTCHAs or adaptive rate limits), you make credential stuffing less profitable for adversaries, prompting them to seek less fortified targets. It’s important to proceed methodically, ensuring you don’t invest more in defense than the potential damage warrants. The goal is not perfect security at any cost, but an optimal balance between protection and core business metrics.

3.Trend Awareness and Data Leaks

Continuously monitoring reports of large-scale data leaks, such as Combolists – a database with millions of passwords from leaked data collected from thousands of Telegram feeds, and staying informed about emerging credential stuffing tactics allows you to strengthen defenses in a timely manner. When attackers gain access to millions of fresh credential pairs, they rapidly test them on iGaming platforms. Anticipating such events helps you raise the security bar before attacks intensify.

4.Process Over Panic

Well-defined principles and data-driven analysis help avoid hasty, radical measures like forcing all players to reset their passwords. Instead, a thorough evaluation of the situation, in-depth log analysis, temporary tagging of suspicious accounts, and implementing additional checks enable measured decisions. This approach maintains player trust, lowers operational risks, and ensures more effective, evidence-based threat mitigation.

5.Alignment with the Business

Knowing in advance about “explosive” marketing campaigns or expected traffic spikes enables you to adjust protective measures – perhaps relaxing certain filters temporarily-without harming conversion rates, first-time deposit (FTD) metrics, or overall player experience. In this way, security measures support, rather than hinder, business growth.

6.The Mini-DDoS Effect

Credential stuffing can overwhelm authentication systems, effectively mimicking a mini-DDoS. Timely scaling of resources, the introduction of CAPTCHAs, or other protective barriers help maintain platform stability and minimize delays or disruptions.

7.Considering Attack Timing

Attacks often begin during periods of reduced vigilance, such as Friday evenings or weekends. Thoughtful scheduling of on-call staff, enhanced monitoring, and readiness for rapid response during these intervals help operators promptly address incidents.

8.Botnets as a Tool for Credential Stuffing

An emerging tactic in credential stuffing attacks is the use of botnets – large networks of compromised devices that automate and scale login attempts. By distributing these attempts across numerous IP addresses and locations, botnets bypass traditional rate-limiting measures and overwhelm authentication systems. Their ability to mimic legitimate traffic complicates detection and mitigation, requiring advanced AI-driven solutions and behavioral analysis to effectively counteract their impact.

9.No Silver Bullets

No single technology guarantees 100% security. A layered, adaptive strategy – combining multiple measures, continuous fine-tuning, and ongoing analysis of attacker behavior – substantially reduces risk. While technical controls cannot eliminate threats entirely, they can make attacks considerably less profitable for cybercriminals.

By following these insights, iGaming operators can not only anticipate and contain credential stuffing attacks, but also do so rationally – avoiding excessive expenditures and safeguarding key performance indicators, all while maintaining player trust.

Conclusion

As the iGaming industry continues to expand, credential stuffing remains a persistent threat, driven by abundant leaked credentials and widespread password reuse. Operators who implement layered security measures – CAPTCHAs, adaptive rate limits, advanced bot management, and vigilant monitoring – can significantly reduce the success and profitability of such attacks.

The objective is not to achieve absolute security at the expense of player experience, but to establish an optimal balance. By making attacks more costly and less attractive, while preserving core business metrics, operators create conditions where adversaries are more likely to move on. Data-driven decision-making, ongoing trend analysis, and continuous refinement of defense strategies help maintain player trust, protect revenue, and ensure a stable, enjoyable environment for everyone involved.

Final Note

As cyber threats continue to evolve, SOFTSWISS remains at the forefront of cybersecurity in the iGaming industry. By continuously monitoring rapidly shifting attack trends and analyzing large-scale data, our team identifies emerging threat vectors and develops tailored protection strategies. We leverage cutting-edge technologies and proprietary innovations to safeguard our clients not only from credential stuffing attacks but also from other modern threats.

However, our mission goes beyond merely protecting platforms. SOFTSWISS is dedicated to advancing the iGaming industry as a whole by raising awareness among all stakeholders about emerging threats, sharing practical recommendations, and highlighting the most effective defense measures. By openly sharing our unique experience and fostering a collaborative approach to cybersecurity, we aim to ensure the long-term growth and integrity of the global iGaming ecosystem.

Cybersecurity is not a static solution but a continuously evolving process. At SOFTSWISS, we take pride in contributing to this journey by equipping operators, players, and the broader iGaming community with the tools, knowledge, and resilience necessary to thrive in a rapidly changing digital world.

 

 

The post From Dark Web to Jackpot: How Cybercriminals Exploit Stolen Credentials in iGaming appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.

There’s a common concern among IT and security leaders: the fear of undetected hackers already lurking within their networks. 

A recent study conducted by Hanover Research revealed that undetected security vulnerabilities top the list of concerns for networking professionals. The worry is well-founded—IBM’s 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report shows it takes an average of 194 days to detect a breach.

High-profile ransomware attacks on companies like CDK and Synnovis underscore the damage stealthy hackers can inflict. The longer malicious actors operate unnoticed, the more proprietary and other information they can collect to hurt the company or fuel a larger attack.

To address this threat, it’s critical to recognize these five early warning signs:

1. Unusual account activity 

Signs of unauthorized network access include unusual account activity, such as a spike in failed login attempts, which may indicate a brute force attack. Watch for users accessing unfamiliar applications or restricted areas, logins from unexpected locations or hours, and multiple simultaneous logins on a single account. Frequent account lockouts or an unusual surge in sent emails can also signal a breach.

2. Suspicious network traffic

Unusual network traffic can indicate a potential system breach. This may appear as sudden increases in network activity, particularly to or from unfamiliar sources or destinations, signifying an active attack or unauthorized data transfer. Communication with malicious botnets—especially with command-and-control servers—is another warning sign. Such abnormal amounts of DNS traffic might indicate the unauthorized transfer of data or secret communications. Unusual internal lateral movement, which suggests attackers seeking to spread across the network, is also a critical warning sign—as are network slowdowns or unexplained spikes in bandwidth usage.

3. System performance issues

Unexplained system performance issues–frequent application crashes or unusually high memory and CPU usage–can also indicate malicious activity. A sudden loss of access to critical resources may be a sign of attackers controlling or blocking access. Any unexpected pop-up windows or error notifications could also indicate active malware trying to disrupt operations or execute harmful actions. 

4. Unauthorized changes in security settings

Unauthorized changes to security settings or audit logs may also be a sign of cybercriminals attempting to avoid detection. Attackers commonly change firewall settings to allow for malicious traffic or interfere with security tools. In some cases, they may disable or uninstall security software entirely. Even disabling notifications can delay responses from security teams, granting attackers additional time to exploit weaknesses without being noticed. 

5. File and program changes

File and program changes—altered file locations, unusual file sizes, or the sudden disappearance of files—can be strong indicators of malicious activity. Suspicious file names or unexpected extensions that deviate from standard conventions should also raise immediate concern. Similarly, the appearance of new files or applications not installed by the user may point to a malware intrusion. Unauthorized changes to file or directory permissions could also signal attempts at privilege escalation or unauthorized access. Any surge in temporary files might indicate that malware may be running while attempting to avoid detection.

Speed Matters: Detecting and Stopping Hackers 

Network security professionals must set up alerts for suspicious login activities, employ multi-factor authentication, and review user permissions. If a breach is suspected, deactivate it as quickly as possible. Change passwords and make certain that security protocols are followed to prevent additional breaches. Check all settings regularly. 

You should also monitor your network closely for unexpected data transfers and traffic using uncommon ports or protocols such as SSH or remote desktop services that are not typically active. And always exercise caution with programs that unexpectedly seek access to the network.

Minimizing the length of time a silent attacker roams around a network is critical. While automated tools are great for catching threats faster, human expertise is still essential for recognizing the subtle anomalies that machines can miss. The most effective approach blends AI-powered analytics with skilled cybersecurity teams that can quickly assess and respond to threats.

Fast, effective incident response protocols are also essential. This includes regularly updating incident response plans and ensuring they are tailored to network-specific needs to reduce downtime and limit potential damage.

SD-WAN, SASE and MDR for Stronger Defense 

With SD-WAN, security teams can monitor traffic patterns in real-time, making it easier to spot anomalies. Key advantages include:

  • Better traffic segmentation: SD-WAN separates traffic between corporate resources, guest networks, and branch locations, minimizing the risk of cross-network attacks.
  • Boosted network performance: By easing network congestion, organizations can reduce performance issues that hide malicious activity.

SASE takes this a step further by combining SD-WAN with advanced security tools like Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB), and Firewall as a Service (FWaaS). This integrated approach enhances both connectivity and security. Key benefits include:

  • Secure remote access: SASE applies security controls at the edge regardless of user location or device, ensuring safe connections for remote workers.
  • Faster threat detection: With firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention, and behavioral analysis, SASE identifies and responds to threats quickly, reducing intruder dwell time.
  • Cloud-native protection: For organizations using hybrid or multi-cloud environments, SASE secures data transfers and monitors for unusual activity across cloud services.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) services are also available to provide continuous threat monitoring and rapid response to attacks that bypass traditional security controls. By integrating with SD-WAN and SASE, MDR enhances network resilience, detecting and mitigating threats in real time across endpoints, cloud environments, and operational technology. Combining automated analytics, third-party intelligence, and expert investigation, MDR reduces false positives, accelerates incident response, and gives organizations improved visibility into security events through detailed reporting.

Hackers can remain undetected for months, increasing the cost and impact of a breach. Firewalls and antivirus alone aren’t enough. A proactive defense—combining AI-driven security, expert monitoring, and a layered network strategy—is the best way to stay ahead of threats.

 

 

The post Top 5 Signs Hackers are in Your Network (and What to Do about It) appeared first on Cybersecurity Insiders.